Malaysia vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts: Time
Malaysia
425 days
in 2019
Tajikistan
430 days
in 2019
Malaysia rank
153rd
Tajikistan rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Malaysia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 430 days against 425 days in Malaysia, a difference of 5 days.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 153rd and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 597 days | 430 days | 167 days | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 441 days | 430 days | 11 days | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Malaysia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 430 days against 425 days in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Malaysia and Tajikistan?
- 5 days, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Malaysia ranks 153rd and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.