Lithuania vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Time

Lithuania
370 days
in 2019
Mauritania
370 days
in 2019
Lithuania rank
170th
Mauritania rank
170th

Enforcing contracts: Time over time

  • Lithuania
  • Mauritania
0100200300400200320112019

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 370 days against 370 days in Mauritania, a difference of 0 days.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 170th and Mauritania ranks 170th of 188 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 222.86 days 391.43 days 168.57 days Mauritania
2010s 356 days 370 days 14 days Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Lithuania or Mauritania?
Lithuania, at 370 days against 370 days in Mauritania as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Lithuania and Mauritania?
0 days, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mauritania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
Lithuania ranks 170th and Mauritania ranks 170th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.