Kyrgyzstan vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Time
Kyrgyzstan
410 days
in 2019
Thailand
420 days
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
157th
Thailand rank
155th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 420 days against 410 days in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 10 days.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 157th and Thailand ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 260 days | 479 days | 219 days | Thailand |
| 2010s | 395 days | 441.8 days | 46.8 days | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Kyrgyzstan or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 420 days against 410 days in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 10 days, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 157th and Thailand ranks 155th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.