Kazakhstan vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Time

Kazakhstan
370 days
in 2019
Lithuania
370 days
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
170th
Lithuania rank
170th

Enforcing contracts: Time over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Lithuania
0100200300400200320112019

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 370 days against 370 days in Lithuania, a difference of 0 days.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 170th and Lithuania ranks 170th of 188 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 395.71 days 222.86 days 172.86 days Kazakhstan
2010s 372 days 356 days 16 days Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Kazakhstan or Lithuania?
Kazakhstan, at 370 days against 370 days in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Kazakhstan and Lithuania?
0 days, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lithuania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Kazakhstan and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
Kazakhstan ranks 170th and Lithuania ranks 170th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.