Japan vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Time
Japan
360 days
in 2019
Mauritania
370 days
in 2019
Japan rank
173rd
Mauritania rank
170th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Japan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 370 days against 360 days in Japan, a difference of 10 days.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 173rd and Mauritania ranks 170th of 188 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 360 days | 391.43 days | 31.43 days | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 360 days | 370 days | 10 days | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Japan or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 370 days against 360 days in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Japan and Mauritania?
- 10 days, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Japan ranks 173rd and Mauritania ranks 170th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.