Japan vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Time
Japan
360 days
in 2019
Lithuania
370 days
in 2019
Japan rank
174th
Lithuania rank
171st
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 370 days against 360 days in Japan, a difference of 10 days.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 174th and Lithuania ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 360 days | 222.86 days | 137.14 days | Japan |
| 2010s | 360 days | 356 days | 4 days | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Japan or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 370 days against 360 days in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Japan and Lithuania?
- 10 days, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Japan ranks 174th and Lithuania ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.