Israel vs Pakistan: Enforcing contracts: Time

Israel
975 days
in 2019
Pakistan
1,071 days
in 2019
Israel rank
24th
Pakistan rank
21st

Enforcing contracts: Time over time

  • Israel
  • Pakistan
02505007501.0k200320112019

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1,071 days against 975 days in Israel, a difference of 96 days.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 24th and Pakistan ranks 21st of 188 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 890 days 907.43 days 17.43 days Pakistan
2010s 958 days 1,055 days 96.61 days Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Israel or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 1,071 days against 975 days in Israel as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Israel and Pakistan?
96 days, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Pakistan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Israel and Pakistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
Israel ranks 24th and Pakistan ranks 21st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.