Iceland vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Time
Iceland
417 days
in 2019
Malaysia
425 days
in 2019
Iceland rank
157th
Malaysia rank
154th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Iceland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 425 days against 417 days in Iceland, a difference of 8 days.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 157th and Malaysia ranks 154th of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 397 days | 597.5 days | 200.5 days | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 417 days | 441 days | 24 days | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Iceland or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 425 days against 417 days in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Iceland and Malaysia?
- 8 days, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malaysia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Iceland ranks 157th and Malaysia ranks 154th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.