Equatorial Guinea vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Time
Equatorial Guinea
475 days
in 2019
Peru
478 days
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
140th
Peru rank
138th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 478 days against 475 days in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3 days.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Peru ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Peru ranks 138th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 475 days | 476.2 days | 1.2 days | Peru |
| 2010s | 475 days | 468.2 days | 6.8 days | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Equatorial Guinea or Peru?
- Peru, at 478 days against 475 days in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Equatorial Guinea and Peru?
- 3 days, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Peru?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Peru ranks 138th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.