Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts: Time

Equatorial Guinea
475 days
in 2019
Namibia
460 days
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
140th
Namibia rank
143rd

Enforcing contracts: Time over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
0100200300400500200320112019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 475 days against 460 days in Namibia, a difference of 15 days.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 475 days 500 days 25 days Namibia
2010s 475 days 472 days 3 days Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 475 days against 460 days in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
15 days, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.