Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Time

Equatorial Guinea
475 days
in 2019
Latvia
469 days
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
140th
Latvia rank
141st

Enforcing contracts: Time over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Latvia
0100200300400500200320112019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 475 days against 469 days in Latvia, a difference of 6 days.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Latvia ranks 141st of 188 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 475 days 285 days 190 days Equatorial Guinea
2010s 475 days 443 days 32 days Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Equatorial Guinea or Latvia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 475 days against 469 days in Latvia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
6 days, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Latvia ranks 141st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.