China vs Eritrea: Enforcing contracts: Time
China
496.25 days
in 2019
Eritrea
490 days
in 2019
China rank
128th
Eritrea rank
129th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- China
- Eritrea
How they compare
China currently reports 496.25 days against 490 days in Eritrea, a difference of 6.25 days.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was China ahead.
China ranks 128th and Eritrea ranks 129th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 421 days | 405 days | 16 days | China |
| 2010s | 473.68 days | 481 days | 7.32 days | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, China or Eritrea?
- China, at 496.25 days against 490 days in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between China and Eritrea?
- 6.25 days, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eritrea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do China and Eritrea rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- China ranks 128th and Eritrea ranks 129th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.