Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Time

Belarus
275 days
in 2019
Uzbekistan
225 days
in 2019
Belarus rank
182nd
Uzbekistan rank
185th

Enforcing contracts: Time over time

  • Belarus
  • Uzbekistan
0100200300200320112019

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 275 days against 225 days in Uzbekistan, a difference of 50 days.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 182nd and Uzbekistan ranks 185th of 188 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 232.14 days 225 days 7.14 days Belarus
2010s 270 days 225 days 45 days Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Belarus or Uzbekistan?
Belarus, at 275 days against 225 days in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Belarus and Uzbekistan?
50 days, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uzbekistan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
Belarus ranks 182nd and Uzbekistan ranks 185th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.