Australia vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Time
Australia
402 days
in 2019
Zimbabwe
410 days
in 2019
Australia rank
160th
Zimbabwe rank
157th
Enforcing contracts: Time over time
- Australia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 410 days against 402 days in Australia, a difference of 8 days.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 395 days | 410 days | 15 days | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 399.9 days | 410 days | 10.1 days | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time, Australia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 410 days against 402 days in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time between Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 8 days, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: time?
- Australia ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time to enforce contracts is recorded in calendar days, counted from the moment plaintiff decides to file the lawsuit in court until payment. The average duration of the following three different stages of dispute resolution is recorded: (i) filing and service, (ii) trial and judgment, and (iii) enforcement.