United Arab Emirates vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
United Arab Emirates
73.36
in 2019
United Kingdom
74.02
in 2019
United Arab Emirates rank
41st
United Kingdom rank
39th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 74.02 against 73.36 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.66.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
United Arab Emirates ranks 41st and United Kingdom ranks 39th of 188 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.82 | 76.78 | 10.96 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 69.5 | 74.64 | 5.14 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, United Arab Emirates or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 74.02 against 73.36 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom?
- 0.66, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 41st and United Kingdom ranks 39th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.