Saudi Arabia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Saudi Arabia
62.7
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
62.46
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
94th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
97th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 62.7 against 62.46 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.24.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 94th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 188 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.79 | 62.46 | 4.67 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 60.74 | 62.46 | 1.72 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Saudi Arabia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saudi Arabia, at 62.7 against 62.46 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.24, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 94th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.