Sao Tome and Principe vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Sao Tome and Principe
12.7
in 2019
East Timor
4.51
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
174th
East Timor rank
175th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- East Timor
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 12.7 against 4.51 in East Timor, a difference of 8.19.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.8 times East Timor's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th and East Timor ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.7 | 0 | 12.7 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 16.89 | 4.51 | 12.38 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or East Timor?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 12.7 against 4.51 in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and East Timor?
- 8.19, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and East Timor?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th and East Timor ranks 175th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.