Samoa vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Samoa
72.54
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
73.36
in 2019
Samoa rank
44th
United Arab Emirates rank
41st
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Samoa
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 73.36 against 72.54 in Samoa, a difference of 0.82.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 44th and United Arab Emirates ranks 41st of 188 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.54 | 65.82 | 6.72 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 72.54 | 69.5 | 3.04 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Samoa or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 73.36 against 72.54 in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Samoa and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.82, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Samoa ranks 44th and United Arab Emirates ranks 41st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.