North Macedonia vs Yemen: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

North Macedonia
57.87
in 2019
Yemen
56.97
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
120th
Yemen rank
123rd

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Yemen
0204060200320112019

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 57.87 against 56.97 in Yemen, a difference of 0.9.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 120th and Yemen ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 62.38 67.21 4.84 Yemen
2010s 57.8 59.02 1.22 Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, North Macedonia or Yemen?
North Macedonia, at 57.87 against 56.97 in Yemen as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between North Macedonia and Yemen?
0.9, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Yemen?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do North Macedonia and Yemen rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
North Macedonia ranks 120th and Yemen ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.