North Macedonia vs Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

North Macedonia
57.87
in 2019
Puerto Rico
58.2
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
120th
Puerto Rico rank
118th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Puerto Rico
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 58.2 against 57.87 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.33.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 120th and Puerto Rico ranks 118th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 62.38 59.02 3.36 North Macedonia
2010s 57.8 58.36 0.5655 Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, North Macedonia or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 58.2 against 57.87 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between North Macedonia and Puerto Rico?
0.33, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Puerto Rico?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do North Macedonia and Puerto Rico rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
North Macedonia ranks 120th and Puerto Rico ranks 118th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.