Mozambique vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Mozambique
31.97
in 2019
Seychelles
34.84
in 2019
Mozambique rank
162nd
Seychelles rank
160th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Mozambique
  • Seychelles
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 34.84 against 31.97 in Mozambique, a difference of 2.87.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 162nd and Seychelles ranks 160th of 188 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 29.02 50.82 21.8 Seychelles
2010s 31.97 36.43 4.47 Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Mozambique or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 34.84 against 31.97 in Mozambique as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Mozambique and Seychelles?
2.87, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Seychelles?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Mozambique and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Mozambique ranks 162nd and Seychelles ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.