South Korea vs Luxembourg: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

South Korea
86.07
in 2019
Luxembourg
83.52
in 2019
South Korea rank
10th
Luxembourg rank
12th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • Luxembourg
020406080100200320112019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 86.07 against 83.52 in Luxembourg, a difference of 2.55.

Across all 14 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 10th and Luxembourg ranks 12th of 188 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 90.98 83.52 7.46 South Korea
2010s 87.05 83.52 3.52 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, South Korea or Luxembourg?
South Korea, at 86.07 against 83.52 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between South Korea and Luxembourg?
2.55, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Luxembourg?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do South Korea and Luxembourg rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
South Korea ranks 10th and Luxembourg ranks 12th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.