Indonesia vs Kyrgyzstan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Indonesia
76.79
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
76.23
in 2019
Indonesia rank
30th
Kyrgyzstan rank
31st
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Indonesia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 76.79 against 76.23 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.56.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Indonesia ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 188 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.02 | 88.52 | 19.51 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 72.23 | 77.46 | 5.23 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Indonesia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Indonesia, at 76.79 against 76.23 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.56, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Indonesia ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 31st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.