Hong Kong vs Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Hong Kong
78.28
in 2019
Nigeria
77.13
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
23rd
Nigeria rank
26th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Nigeria
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 78.28 against 77.13 in Nigeria, a difference of 1.15.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 23rd and Nigeria ranks 26th of 188 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.68 | 62.79 | 26.9 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 78.93 | 73.02 | 5.92 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Hong Kong or Nigeria?
- Hong Kong, at 78.28 against 77.13 in Nigeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Hong Kong and Nigeria?
- 1.15, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Nigeria?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Nigeria rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 23rd and Nigeria ranks 26th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.