Guyana vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Guyana
62.21
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
62.46
in 2019
Guyana rank
98th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
97th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Guyana
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0204060200420112019

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 62.46 against 62.21 in Guyana, a difference of 0.25.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 98th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 188 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 62.21 62.46 0.2459 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 62.21 62.46 0.2459 Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Guyana or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 62.46 against 62.21 in Guyana as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Guyana and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.25, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Guyana and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Guyana ranks 98th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.