Gabon vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Gabon
14.75
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
12.7
in 2019
Gabon rank
171st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
174th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Gabon
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0510152025200420112019

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 14.75 against 12.7 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.05.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.

Gabon ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 188 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 22.13 12.7 9.43 Gabon
2010s 19.18 16.89 2.3 Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Gabon or Sao Tome and Principe?
Gabon, at 14.75 against 12.7 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe?
2.05, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Gabon and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Gabon ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.