France vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

France
73.2
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
73.36
in 2019
France rank
43rd
United Arab Emirates rank
41st

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • France
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080200320112019

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 73.36 against 73.2 in France, a difference of 0.16.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was France ahead.

France ranks 43rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 41st of 188 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 73.2 65.82 7.38 France
2010s 73.2 69.5 3.7 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, France or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 73.36 against 73.2 in France as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between France and United Arab Emirates?
0.16, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and United Arab Emirates?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do France and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
France ranks 43rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 41st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.