Eswatini vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Eswatini
31.48
in 2019
Philippines
30.98
in 2019
Eswatini rank
163rd
Philippines rank
164th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Philippines
0102030200320112019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 31.48 against 30.98 in Philippines, a difference of 0.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.

Eswatini ranks 163rd and Philippines ranks 164th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 30.16 30.98 0.8197 Philippines
2010s 31.21 30.98 0.2295 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Eswatini or Philippines?
Eswatini, at 31.48 against 30.98 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Eswatini and Philippines?
0.5, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Philippines?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Eswatini ranks 163rd and Philippines ranks 164th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.