Equatorial Guinea vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
70.9
in 2019
Sweden
70.25
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
49th
Sweden rank
52nd
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sweden
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 70.9 against 70.25 in Sweden, a difference of 0.65.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.9 | 65.77 | 5.13 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 70.9 | 70.42 | 0.4836 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Sweden?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 70.9 against 70.25 in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
- 0.65, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sweden?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.