Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
70.9
in 2019
Namibia
72.13
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
51st
Namibia rank
48th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 72.13 against 70.9 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Namibia ranks 48th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.9 | 68.85 | 2.05 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 70.9 | 71.15 | 0.2459 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 72.13 against 70.9 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 1.23, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 51st and Namibia ranks 48th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.