El Salvador vs Madagascar: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

El Salvador
42.95
in 2019
Madagascar
43.36
in 2019
El Salvador rank
151st
Madagascar rank
150th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • El Salvador
  • Madagascar
010203040200320112019

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 43.36 against 42.95 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.41.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 151st and Madagascar ranks 150th of 188 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Madagascar Difference Ahead
2000s 42.95 38.44 4.51 El Salvador
2010s 42.95 38.93 4.02 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, El Salvador or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 43.36 against 42.95 in El Salvador as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between El Salvador and Madagascar?
0.41, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Madagascar?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do El Salvador and Madagascar rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
El Salvador ranks 151st and Madagascar ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.