Dominican Republic vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Dominican Republic
61.48
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
62.46
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
100th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
97th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 62.46 against 61.48 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.98.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 100th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 188 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.16 | 62.46 | 7.7 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 63.61 | 62.46 | 1.15 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Dominican Republic or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 62.46 against 61.48 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Dominican Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.98, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 100th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.