Cote d'Ivoire vs Ethiopia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Cote d'Ivoire
66.8
in 2019
Ethiopia
66.39
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
79th
Ethiopia rank
81st

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Ethiopia
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 66.8 against 66.39 in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.41.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 79th and Ethiopia ranks 81st of 188 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Ethiopia Difference Ahead
2000s 46.72 55.15 8.43 Ethiopia
2010s 60.29 66.39 6.11 Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Ethiopia?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 66.8 against 66.39 in Ethiopia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Ethiopia?
0.41, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Ethiopia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Ethiopia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 79th and Ethiopia ranks 81st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.