Costa Rica vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Costa Rica
40
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
37.3
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
154th
Micronesia (country) rank
156th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Micronesia (country)
010203040200320112019

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 40 against 37.3 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 2.7.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia (country)'s.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 154th and Micronesia (country) ranks 156th of 188 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 38.24 37.3 0.9484 Costa Rica
2010s 40 37.3 2.7 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Costa Rica or Micronesia (country)?
Costa Rica, at 40 against 37.3 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Costa Rica and Micronesia (country)?
2.7, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Micronesia (country)?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Costa Rica and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Costa Rica ranks 154th and Micronesia (country) ranks 156th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.