Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Costa Rica
40
in 2019
El Salvador
42.95
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
154th
El Salvador rank
151st

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Costa Rica
  • El Salvador
010203040200320112019

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 42.95 against 40 in Costa Rica, a difference of 2.95.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 154th and El Salvador ranks 151st of 188 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica El Salvador Difference Ahead
2000s 38.24 42.95 4.71 El Salvador
2010s 40 42.95 2.95 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 42.95 against 40 in Costa Rica as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
2.95, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Costa Rica ranks 154th and El Salvador ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.