Democratic Republic of Congo vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
59.84
in 2019
Zambia
59.75
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
111th
Zambia rank
112th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 59.84 against 59.75 in Zambia, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zambia ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 111th and Zambia ranks 112th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.09 | 67.95 | 11.86 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 59.84 | 59.75 | 0.082 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Zambia?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 59.84 against 59.75 in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
- 0.09, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 111th and Zambia ranks 112th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.