Democratic Republic of Congo vs Paraguay: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Democratic Republic of Congo
59.84
in 2019
Paraguay
60.16
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
111th
Paraguay rank
110th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Paraguay
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 60.16 against 59.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.32.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 111th and Paraguay ranks 110th of 188 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Paraguay Difference Ahead
2000s 56.09 61.39 5.3 Paraguay
2010s 59.84 60.41 0.5737 Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 60.16 against 59.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Paraguay?
0.32, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Paraguay?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Paraguay rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 111th and Paraguay ranks 110th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.