Chile vs Iraq: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Chile
67.3
in 2019
Iraq
67.21
in 2019
Chile rank
75th
Iraq rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Chile
- Iraq
How they compare
Chile currently reports 67.3 against 67.21 in Iraq, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iraq ahead.
Chile ranks 75th and Iraq ranks 76th of 188 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.13 | 67.21 | 0.082 | Iraq |
| 2010s | 67.15 | 67.21 | 0.0656 | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Chile or Iraq?
- Chile, at 67.3 against 67.21 in Iraq as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Chile and Iraq?
- 0.09, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iraq?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Iraq rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Chile ranks 75th and Iraq ranks 76th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.