Central African Republic vs Senegal: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Central African Republic
55.74
in 2019
Senegal
56.56
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
128th
Senegal rank
125th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 56.56 against 55.74 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.82.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 128th and Senegal ranks 125th of 188 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.74 | 30.74 | 25 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 55.74 | 38.07 | 17.66 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 56.56 against 55.74 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Senegal?
- 0.82, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Senegal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Senegal rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 128th and Senegal ranks 125th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.