Central African Republic vs Czechia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Central African Republic
55.74
in 2019
Czechia
54.26
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
128th
Czechia rank
131st
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Czechia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 55.74 against 54.26 in Czechia, a difference of 1.48.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 128th and Czechia ranks 131st of 188 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.74 | 51.08 | 4.66 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 55.74 | 54.26 | 1.48 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Czechia?
- Central African Republic, at 55.74 against 54.26 in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Czechia?
- 1.48, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Czechia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Czechia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 128th and Czechia ranks 131st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.