Burundi vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Burundi
41.64
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
37.3
in 2019
Burundi rank
153rd
Micronesia (country) rank
156th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Burundi
  • Micronesia (country)
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 41.64 against 37.3 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 4.34.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia (country)'s.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 153rd and Micronesia (country) ranks 156th of 188 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 54.78 37.3 17.48 Burundi
2010s 41.64 37.3 4.34 Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Burundi or Micronesia (country)?
Burundi, at 41.64 against 37.3 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Burundi and Micronesia (country)?
4.34, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Micronesia (country)?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Burundi and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Burundi ranks 153rd and Micronesia (country) ranks 156th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.