Burkina Faso vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Burkina Faso
73.28
in 2019
United States
73.44
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
42nd
United States rank
40th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • United States
020406080200320112019

How they compare

United States currently reports 73.44 against 73.28 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.16.

Across all 17 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 42nd and United States ranks 40th of 188 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso United States Difference Ahead
2000s 73.28 85.25 11.97 United States
2010s 73.28 76.41 3.13 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Burkina Faso or United States?
United States, at 73.44 against 73.28 in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Burkina Faso and United States?
0.16, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and United States?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Burkina Faso ranks 42nd and United States ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.