Burkina Faso vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Burkina Faso
73.28
in 2019
United Kingdom
74.02
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
42nd
United Kingdom rank
39th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • United Kingdom
020406080200320112019

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 74.02 against 73.28 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.74.

Across all 17 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 42nd and United Kingdom ranks 39th of 188 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 73.28 76.78 3.5 United Kingdom
2010s 73.28 74.64 1.36 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Burkina Faso or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 74.02 against 73.28 in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Burkina Faso and United Kingdom?
0.74, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and United Kingdom?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Burkina Faso ranks 42nd and United Kingdom ranks 39th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.