Brunei Darussalam vs State of Palestine: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
65.57
in 2019
State of Palestine
65.57
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
84th
State of Palestine rank
84th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- State of Palestine
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 65.57 against 65.57 in State of Palestine, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 84th and State of Palestine ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | State of Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.57 | 54.51 | 11.07 | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 65.57 | 65.57 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Brunei Darussalam or State of Palestine?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 65.57 against 65.57 in State of Palestine as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Brunei Darussalam and State of Palestine?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and State of Palestine?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and State of Palestine rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 84th and State of Palestine ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.