Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Switzerland: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
61.07
in 2019
Switzerland
60.82
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
104th
Switzerland rank
107th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Switzerland
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 61.07 against 60.82 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.25.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Switzerland ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Switzerland ranks 107th of 190 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.55 | 65.98 | 8.43 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 61.07 | 62.81 | 1.75 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Switzerland?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 61.07 against 60.82 in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Switzerland?
- 0.25, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Switzerland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Switzerland rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Switzerland ranks 107th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.