Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Dominican Republic: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
61.07
in 2019
Dominican Republic
61.48
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
105th
Dominican Republic rank
102nd
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 61.48 against 61.07 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.41.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th and Dominican Republic ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.55 | 67.92 | 10.36 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 61.07 | 63.61 | 2.54 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 61.48 against 61.07 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dominican Republic?
- 0.41, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dominican Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dominican Republic rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th and Dominican Republic ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.