Bolivia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Bolivia
61.39
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
61.07
in 2019
Bolivia rank
101st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
103rd
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bolivia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 61.39 against 61.07 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.32.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Bolivia ranks 101st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.39 | 77.54 | 16.15 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 61.39 | 64.36 | 2.97 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Bolivia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Bolivia, at 61.39 against 61.07 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Bolivia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.32, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Bolivia ranks 101st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.