Bahrain vs North Macedonia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Bahrain
57.79
in 2019
North Macedonia
57.87
in 2019
Bahrain rank
121st
North Macedonia rank
120th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Bahrain
  • North Macedonia
0204060200320112019

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 57.87 against 57.79 in Bahrain, a difference of 0.08.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahrain ahead.

Bahrain ranks 121st and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.79 54.73 3.06 Bahrain
2010s 57.79 57.8 0.0082 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Bahrain or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 57.87 against 57.79 in Bahrain as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Bahrain and North Macedonia?
0.08, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and North Macedonia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
How do Bahrain and North Macedonia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Bahrain ranks 121st and North Macedonia ranks 120th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.