Bahamas vs State of Palestine: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Bahamas
65.16
in 2019
State of Palestine
65.57
in 2019
Bahamas rank
86th
State of Palestine rank
84th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- State of Palestine
How they compare
State of Palestine currently reports 65.57 against 65.16 in Bahamas, a difference of 0.41.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 86th and State of Palestine ranks 84th of 190 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | State of Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.77 | 55.19 | 18.58 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 66.89 | 65.57 | 1.31 | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Bahamas or State of Palestine?
- State of Palestine, at 65.57 against 65.16 in Bahamas as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Bahamas and State of Palestine?
- 0.41, with State of Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and State of Palestine?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and State of Palestine rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 86th and State of Palestine ranks 84th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.