Azerbaijan vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Azerbaijan
87.13
in 2019
South Korea
86.07
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
8th
South Korea rank
10th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • South Korea
020406080100200320112019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 87.13 against 86.07 in South Korea, a difference of 1.06.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Korea ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 8th and South Korea ranks 10th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan South Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 88.65 90.98 2.33 South Korea
2010s 88.11 87.05 1.07 Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Azerbaijan or South Korea?
Azerbaijan, at 87.13 against 86.07 in South Korea as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Azerbaijan and South Korea?
1.06, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and South Korea?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 8th and South Korea ranks 10th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.